| |
|
The Sum of it All
According to comprehensive scientific
studies there is no convincing evidence that financial newsletters or
market experts exhibit stock picking and market timing abilities that would
enable them to outperform the markets over time.
Andrew Metrick of Harvard University finds - based on analysis of the 'Hulbert
Financial Digest' - that the newsletters tracked show no significant
evidence of superior stock-picking ability.
Mark Hulbert himself suggests that only 5% of analysts (at best, if any) consistently outperform the
Wilshire 5000 Index.
Now consider the fact that the average of all trades on record here
outperform the S&P 500 by 57%, and that 79.7% of all ranked Tipsters have
outperformed this index over time (per April 2006).
So what gives? Maybe it's the fundamental thesis that experts will always be most comfortable
with sharing their safest picks. Maybe it's the rigid trading disciplin that will limit losses and lock in profits.
Quite likely it's in part because only the best Tipsters are ranked in the first place. Most probably it is a combination of all.
|
|
Even so, unless you subscribe to the somewhat flawed Efficient Market Hypothesis and believe that the market cannot possibly be beaten,
the question comes to mind:"Who then is the best Tipster right now?"
The rankings list may give a clue, but it is tied to all-time performance and does not
reveal how long or how often a high score has been achieved. Also, some Tipsters have been followed longer than others, and that may
skew the results. In order to somehow objectively decide who is best this year, we need to take a look at what else is in the data.
We will try to give the answer based upon the performance in 4 categories, "All-time Performance", "Year Return",
"Accuracy", and "Ideal Value". In the end we will name our favorite Tipster as the one best positioned in all 4 categories.
As usual, scores are updated daily. At the end of the year we will name the "Tipster of the Year 2010" and reset
the counters for next year.
|
|
Top
Tipsters 2010 - All-time Performance
|
Current Status
|
|
|
 |
 |
Top 100 |
|
|
Category 1:
All-time Performance
Consistency
In this category we rely on our usual algorithms, which take into consideration numerous parameters
and assign points by comparing Tipsters to each other and the market (the S&P 500).
The algorithms are designed to reward high annualized returns at moderate risk.
All picks on record are evaluated in this category. The outcome is the sum of daily scores.
Tipsters with no current score keep their latest standing.
|
Category 2:
Year Return
Timing
To qualify for this and the next categories Tipsters must have a total of at
least 18 positions on record at the end of the year - f.ex. 6 at the start
of the year and 1 per progressing month.
These are not compounded returns. The averaged annualized return is calculated using
the average return percentage and the average number of days positions are held.
Only positions opened or closed this year are evaluated.
Positions open at the beginning of the year are evaluated using the close price
per December 30, 2009.
|
|
Top
Tipsters 2010 - Year Return
|
Current Status
|
|
|
 |
 |
Top 100 |
|
|
|
Top
Tipsters 2010 - Accuracy
|
Current Status
|
|
|
 |
 |
Top 100 |
|
|
Category 3:
Accuracy
Risk
This is the ratio of profitable positions to the total number of picks open this
year.
As in categories 2 and 4, expect considerable volatility, particularly in the first months
of the year.
|
Category 4:
Ideal Value
Reward
Finally, in fairness to those Tipsters who are fuming over our trading methodology,
we take a look at how well you could have done with a Tipster's picks, assuming that you had no exit
strategy, no profit lock, and the talent to sell a stock at the absolute high within 6 months.
The outcome is displayed as the average of all ideal returns, as always assuming equal dollar weighting.
|
|
Top
Tipsters 2010 - Ideal Value
|
Current Status
|
|
|
 |
 |
Top 100 |
|
|
|

|
|